Quantum Computing and Control Systems

•10 min read•Updated Jan 20, 2026•Loading...

Overview

Quantum computing represents a paradigm shift in computational power, with implications extending far beyond academic research. Within the Pax Judaica framework, quantum computing is viewed as a critical technology for establishing unprecedented control systems through:

Breaking existing encryption standards
Enabling AI systems of vastly superior capability
Creating unhackable communication networks for elites
Developing predictive modeling for social control
Establishing quantum financial systems

The Technology: What's Documented

Quantum Computing Basics

Scientific consensus:

Quantum computers use qubits instead of classical bits1
Superposition and entanglement enable parallel processing1
Certain problems become exponentially easier to solve2
Current systems remain experimental and limited3

Major players (documented):

Organization	Quantum System	Status	Source

IBM	IBM Quantum	127+ qubit systems operational	IBM Press Releases4
Google	Sycamore	Claimed quantum supremacy (2019)	Nature 20195
D-Wave	Quantum Annealer	Commercial availability	D-Wave Documentation6
IonQ	Trapped Ion	Public company (NYSE: IONQ)	SEC Filings7
Israeli Quantum	Various startups	Government-funded initiatives	Israeli Innovation Authority8

Israeli Quantum Computing Sector

Documented facts:

Israel Quantum Computing Center established (2018)8
Substantial government funding for quantum research8
Multiple quantum computing startups (Quantum Machines, etc.)9
Military applications development10

The Pax Judaica Connection

Israeli Quantum Advantage Theory

The claim: Israel is positioning itself to dominate quantum computing, giving it unparalleled intelligence and control capabilities.

Supporting evidence cited:

Documented: Israel has robust quantum research sector8 9

Documented: Military applications are being developed10

Speculative: This is part of coordinated plan for technological supremacy

Speculative: Mossad will use quantum computers for intelligence dominance

Speculative: Quantum advantage enables Pax Judaica control systems

Surveillance State Infrastructure

The framework:


Quantum Computing
↓
AI with superior capabilities
↓
Behavioral prediction systems
↓
Pre-crime detection
↓
Total population control

What's documented vs. speculative:

Element	Status	Sources

Quantum research exists	✓ Documented	Academic literature1 2 3
AI surveillance systems exist	✓ Documented	Zuboff (2019)19, Snowden disclosures20
Predictive policing deployed	✓ Documented	Multiple police departments21
Behavioral prediction at scale	⚠ Limited success	Mixed research results22
Pre-crime systems	✗ Speculative	No evidence of deployment
Quantum AI supremacy	✗ Speculative	Technology doesn't exist yet

Historical Precedents

The Manhattan Project Parallel

The comparison: Just as the atomic bomb was developed in secret, quantum computing breakthroughs may be classified.

Documented facts about Manhattan Project:

Secret development 1942-194523
Successful despite Allied ignorance
Changed geopolitical balance instantly23

Why the parallel may not hold:

Quantum computing requires massive infrastructure visible to satellites
International quantum research is open and published
No evidence of secret breakthrough
Physics community is interconnected and skeptical24

The NSA's Historical Advantage

Documented: NSA had advanced cryptographic capabilities before public awareness20 25

Examples:

Differential cryptanalysis discovered internally, kept secret25
Advanced supercomputing capabilities20
Backdoors in encryption standards (Dual_EC_DRBG)26

The question: Does NSA/Unit 8200 have secret quantum advantage?

Academic consensus: Unlikely, based on physical requirements and international research24

Technical Limitations

Why Quantum Computing Isn't Magic

Physical constraints (documented):3

Decoherence: Quantum states are extremely fragile

Error rates: Current systems have high error rates requiring correction

Scaling challenges: Adding qubits increases difficulty exponentially

Cooling requirements: Most systems require near absolute zero temperatures

Algorithm limitations: Only certain problems benefit from quantum speedup

The Hype Cycle

Documented pattern:

Quantum computing investment has boom-bust cycles27
Capabilities routinely overstated by companies seeking funding27
"Quantum winter" concerns similar to "AI winter" precedents27

Gartner Hype Cycle analysis: Quantum computing currently at "Peak of Inflated Expectations"28

Critiques and Counter-Arguments

Critique 1: Technology Isn't There Yet

Academic consensus: Cryptographically relevant quantum computers are 10-30 years away, if achievable at all.13

Counter-argument from conspiracy perspective:

"That's what they want you to think"
Classification means public timeline is irrelevant
Breakthrough could happen unexpectedly

Critique 2: Post-Quantum Cryptography Exists

Documented: NIST is standardizing post-quantum encryption algorithms resistant to quantum attacks.12

Counter-argument:

Deployment will be slow
Backdoors may exist in new standards
Quantum computers may break post-quantum crypto too

Critique 3: Attribution of Intent

Critique: Israeli quantum research is normal academic/military R&D, not evidence of grand conspiracy.

Counter-argument:

Scale and coordination suggest intentionality
Military applications are explicit10
Fits broader Pax Judaica pattern

The Eschatological Dimension

Quantum Computing in Prophecy Interpretation

Jacob Frank's vision: Creating God through technology - quantum AI as manifestation of this goal.

Interpretations:

Quantum computer as "thinking substrate" for artificial deity
Ultimate achievement of materialist project
"Digital Dajjal" powered by quantum supremacy
Transhumanist apotheosis through quantum-biological interface

Academic context: For study of technology in religious prophecy, see Barkun, A Culture of Conspiracy (2003)29.

Resistance and Counter-Technologies

Post-Quantum Cryptography

Status: NIST standardization process underway12

Algorithms selected:

CRYSTALS-Kyber (key encapsulation)
CRYSTALS-Dilithium (digital signatures)
FALCON (digital signatures)
SPHINCS+ (digital signatures)

Quantum-Resistant Blockchains

Developments:

QAN Platform claims quantum resistance30
Quantum Resistant Ledger (QRL) launched 201831
Bitcoin vulnerability discussions ongoing32

Distributed Defense Strategy

The theory: Decentralized quantum computing prevents monopolistic control.

Challenges:

Quantum computers can't be easily distributed
Massive infrastructure requirements
Cooling and isolation needs

Implications for Individual Liberty

Scenarios

Scenario 1: Quantum Decryption (if achieved)

All historical encrypted communications readable
Privacy becomes impossible
Dissidents identifiable retroactively

Scenario 2: Quantum AI Supremacy (if achieved)

Perfect behavioral prediction
Thought-crime detection
Algorithmic social control

Scenario 3: Quantum Financial System (if implemented)

Unhackable central bank digital currency
Perfect transaction surveillance
Programmable money with embedded restrictions

Probability Assessment

Academic consensus on timeline:13 24

Capability	Conservative Estimate	Optimistic Estimate

Break RSA-2048	20-30 years	10-15 years
Quantum AI superiority	30+ years	Unknown
Widespread quantum networks	15-25 years	10-15 years

Discussion Questions

Does quantum computing research require new ethical frameworks?

Should quantum computing development be internationally regulated?

If quantum supremacy is achieved, who should control the technology?

How do we balance innovation with privacy concerns?

Is the "quantum threat" overstated or understated?

Discussion(0 comments)

Join the conversationSign in to share your perspectiveSign In

Loading comments...

Contribute to this Article

Help improve this article by suggesting edits, adding sources, or expanding content.

Submit via EmailSend your edits

References

Nielsen, Michael and Isaac Chuang. Quantum Computation and Quantum Information. Cambridge University Press, 2010. ISBN: 978-1107002173. The standard textbook.

Shor, Peter. "Polynomial-Time Algorithms for Prime Factorization and Discrete Logarithms on a Quantum Computer." SIAM Journal on Computing 26:5 (1997): 1484-1509.

Preskill, John. "Quantum Computing in the NISQ era and beyond." Quantum 2 (2018): 79. doi:10.22331/q-2018-08-06-79

IBM Quantum roadmap. https://www.ibm.com/quantum/roadmap

https://www.ibm.com/quantum/roadmap

Arute, Frank, et al. "Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor." Nature 574 (2019): 505-510.

D-Wave Systems. Technical documentation. https://docs.dwavesys.com/

https://docs.dwavesys.com/

IonQ SEC filings. https://investors.ionq.com/

https://investors.ionq.com/

Israel Innovation Authority. "Israel Quantum Initiative." https://innovationisrael.org.il/en/

https://innovationisrael.org.il/en/

Start-Up Nation Central. "Israeli Quantum Computing Ecosystem Report" (2021).

Israel Defense Forces. Technology and Logistics Directorate, Quantum Technologies Division. Public statements.

Shor, Peter. "Algorithms for quantum computation: discrete logarithms and factoring." Proceedings 35th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (1994): 124-134.

National Institute of Standards and Technology. "Post-Quantum Cryptography Standardization." https://csrc.nist.gov/projects/post-quantum-cryptography

https://csrc.nist.gov/projects/post-quantum-cryptography

Mosca, Michele. "Cybersecurity in an Era with Quantum Computers: Will We Be Ready?" IEEE Security & Privacy 16:5 (2018): 38-41.

Biamonte, Jacob, et al. "Quantum machine learning." Nature 549 (2017): 195-202.

Preskill, John. "Quantum computing and the entanglement frontier." arXiv:1203.5813 (2012).

Gisin, Nicolas, et al. "Quantum cryptography." Reviews of Modern Physics 74:1 (2002): 145.

Liao, Sheng-Kai, et al. "Satellite-to-ground quantum key distribution." Nature 549 (2017): 43-47.

Kiktenko, Evgeniy O., et al. "Quantum-secured blockchain." Quantum Science and Technology 3:3 (2018): 035004.

Zuboff, Shoshana. The Age of Surveillance Capitalism. PublicAffairs, 2019. ISBN: 978-1610395694.

Greenwald, Glenn. No Place to Hide: Edward Snowden, the NSA, and the U.S. Surveillance State. Metropolitan Books, 2014. ISBN: 978-1627790734.

Ferguson, Andrew Guthrie. The Rise of Big Data Policing. NYU Press, 2017. ISBN: 978-1479862917.

Christin, Angèle, et al. "Courts and Predictive Algorithms." Data & Civil Rights (2015).

Rhodes, Richard. The Making of the Atomic Bomb. Simon & Schuster, 1986. ISBN: 978-0684813783.

Aaronson, Scott. "The Limits of Quantum Computers." Scientific American 298:3 (2008): 62-69.

Coppersmith, Don. "The Data Encryption Standard (DES) and its strength against attacks." IBM Journal of Research and Development 38:3 (1994): 243-250.

Checkoway, Stephen, et al. "On the Practical Exploitability of Dual EC in TLS Implementations." USENIX Security (2014).

Gibney, Elizabeth. "Quantum gold rush: the private funding pouring into quantum start-ups." Nature 574 (2019): 22-24.

Gartner. "Hype Cycle for Emerging Technologies" (2023). https://www.gartner.com/

https://www.gartner.com/

Barkun, Michael. A Culture of Conspiracy: Apocalyptic Visions in Contemporary America. University of California Press, 2003. ISBN: 978-0520238053.

QAN Platform. White paper. https://qanplatform.com/

https://qanplatform.com/

Quantum Resistant Ledger. Documentation. https://www.theqrl.org/

https://www.theqrl.org/

Aggarwal, Divesh, et al. "Quantum attacks on Bitcoin, and how to protect against them." Ledger 3 (2018).