The Balfour Declaration: Foundation of Modern Israel

•14 min read•Updated Jan 20, 2026•Loading...

Overview

The Balfour Declaration was a public statement issued by the British government on November 2, 1917, during World War I, announcing support for the establishment of a "national home for the Jewish people" in Palestine. Within the Pax Judaica framework, the Declaration represents:

Historically: Pivotal document enabling creation of Israel (1948)
Conspiratorially: Rothschild-British elite secret agreement to implement Zionist project
Eschatologically: First stage of fulfilling Newton's prophecy plan
Geopolitically: British imperial strategy disguised as humanitarian gesture

The Document (Primary Source)

Full Text

Letter from Foreign Secretary Arthur Balfour to Lord Rothschild, November 2, 1917:1

Foreign Office

November 2nd, 1917

Dear Lord Rothschild,

I have much pleasure in conveying to you, on behalf of His Majesty's Government, the following declaration of sympathy with Jewish Zionist aspirations which has been submitted to, and approved by, the Cabinet.

"His Majesty's Government view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavours to facilitate the achievement of this object, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country."

I should be grateful if you would bring this declaration to the knowledge of the Zionist Federation.

Yours sincerely,

Arthur James Balfour

Key Elements

67 words that changed history:

Phrase	Ambiguity	Interpretation Conflict

"national home"	Not "state" or "nation"	Zionists: means state; Arabs: means cultural center
"in Palestine"	Not "of Palestine"	Implies part of, not all of Palestine
"Jewish people"	Undefined	Who qualifies? Religious or ethnic?
"nothing shall be done which may prejudice..."	Vague protection	Whose rights take precedence?

Notable: Addressed to Lord Rothschild, not to Zionist organization officially.2

--------

Western Front	Stalemate	Need new allies/fronts
Russian Revolution	March/November 1917	Eastern Front collapsing
U.S. entry	April 1917	Need to maintain American support
Ottoman Empire	Enemy	Palestine under Ottoman control
War exhaustion	Critical	Britain near breaking point

Strategic calculations:4

Win Jewish support globally (especially in Russia and U.S.)

Preempt French claims to Palestine

Secure route to India (Suez Canal)

Create buffer zone for British interests

The Players

Key British figures:5

Name	Position	Role	Motivation

Arthur Balfour	Foreign Secretary	Author of Declaration	Christian Zionist sympathies6
David Lloyd George	Prime Minister	Approved Declaration	Biblical prophecy beliefs7
Lord Rothschild	Banker, Zionist	Recipient	Family connection to Zionism
Chaim Weizmann	Chemist, Zionist leader	Lobbyist	Zionist state goal
Mark Sykes	Diplomat	Negotiator	Imperial strategist

Key opponents within British government:8

Edwin Montagu (only Jewish cabinet member) - opposed
Lord Curzon (Foreign Office) - skeptical
Military leadership - worried about Arab reaction

The Conspiracy Perspective

The Rothschild Connection

Documented facts:

Letter addressed to Lord Walter Rothschild (2nd Baron Rothschild)1
Rothschild family prominent in Zionist movement9
Family banking connections to British government10
Previous Rothschild support for Jewish settlement in Palestine11

Questions raised:

Why address letter to Rothschild, not official Zionist organization?

What was quid pro quo for British government?

Was this payment for Rothschild financial support?

Did Rothschilds orchestrate WWI to enable this outcome?

The Secret Negotiations

Documented meetings (from historical record):12

Timeline of key negotiations:

Date	Event	Participants	Significance

January 1906	Balfour-Weizmann meeting	Balfour, Weizmann	First discussion of Jewish state
May 1916	Sykes-Picot Agreement	Britain, France, Russia	Secret partition of Ottoman Empire13
1916-1917	Weizmann-British negotiations	Weizmann, Lloyd George, Balfour	Crafting Declaration
October 1917	Final Cabinet approval	British War Cabinet	Last-minute opposition overcome
November 2, 1917	Declaration issued	—	Public announcement

The secret negotiations revealed:14

Multiple drafts revised to balance interests
Heavy lobbying by Weizmann
Opposition suppressed
Promises made to Arabs (Hussein-McMahon) contradicted15

Conflicting Promises

The "triple promise" scandal (documented):16

Promise 1 - To Arabs (Hussein-McMahon Correspondence, 1915-1916):

Britain promised Arab independence
Including Palestine (ambiguous language)
In exchange for Arab Revolt against Ottomans15

Promise 2 - To French (Sykes-Picot Agreement, May 1916):

Palestine to be internationalized
French control over Syria
Secret agreement13

Promise 3 - To Zionists (Balfour Declaration, November 1917):

Jewish national home in Palestine
British support for Zionist project1

Analysis: Three contradictory promises for same territory.16

The Pax Judaica Interpretation

Stage I of the Three Stages Model

The framework:

Pax Britannica's role (per eschatological interpretation):

✅ Dismantle Ottoman Caliphate (WWI)

✅ Secure Palestine for Jewish settlement (Balfour Declaration)

✅ Establish British Mandate (1920-1948)

✅ Enable Jewish immigration waves

✅ Transfer control to Pax Americana for final stage

Newton's Prophecy Plan in Action

Isaac Newton's interpretation of biblical prophecy (documented):17

Jews must return to Holy Land
Temple must be rebuilt
These are prerequisites for Second Coming

British Christian Zionism (documented influence):18

Lloyd George raised on Bible in Wales7
Balfour influenced by evangelical Christianity6
British Israelism movement (British as lost tribes)19
Belief in fulfilling prophecy through policy18

The conspiracy thesis: Declaration was not strategic calculation but theological mission.

Freemasonry Connection

Documented Masonic affiliations:20

Figure	Masonic Status	Evidence

Arthur Balfour	Speculated member	No definitive proof
Lord Rothschild	No evidence	—
Chaim Weizmann	No evidence	—
Winston Churchill	Confirmed member	Well documented21

Speculative claim: Freemasons executing Newton's plan through Balfour Declaration.

Counter-evidence: Most key players not documented Masons; strategic explanations sufficient.22

Consequences of the Declaration

Immediate Effects (1917-1920)

Documented outcomes:23

Arab anger: Felt betrayed by British

Zionist jubilation: Major victory for movement

French frustration: British acting unilaterally

Ottoman response: Denounced as illegitimate

Jewish immigration: Increased immediately

The British Mandate (1920-1948)

League of Nations Mandate (1920):24

British given administrative control of Palestine
Explicit incorporation of Balfour Declaration into Mandate terms
Britain obligated to facilitate Jewish immigration
Arab majority opposed throughout

Key events during Mandate:25

Year	Event	Deaths	Significance

1920	Nebi Musa riots	5 killed	First major violence
1929	Hebron massacre	67 Jews killed	Escalating tension
1936-39	Arab Revolt	5,000+ killed	British crackdown
1939	White Paper	—	Britain limits Jewish immigration
1947	UN Partition Plan	—	End of Mandate proposed
1948	Israeli independence	6,000+ in war	British withdraw

Long-Term Consequences

The Israeli-Palestinian conflict (ongoing):

1948 Nakba: 700,000+ Palestinians displaced26
1967 Six-Day War: Israeli territorial expansion27
Ongoing occupation and settlements28
No resolution as of 2026

Death toll (estimated cumulative since 1948):29

25,000+ Israeli deaths
90,000+ Palestinian/Arab deaths
Millions displaced over decades

Historical Debate

Mainstream Historical Interpretations

Interpretation 1: Strategic Realism30

Britain acting in national interest during WWI
Jewish support (Russia, U.S.) valuable
Palestine strategic for empire
Humanitarian concerns secondary

Interpretation 2: Moral Imperative31

Sympathy for Jewish persecution
Zionism seen as progressive national movement
Britain helping oppressed minority
Idealism motivating policy

Interpretation 3: Imperial Cynicism32

Contradictory promises deliberate
Divide and rule strategy
Neither Jews nor Arabs truly intended to get state
British intended permanent control

The Counterfactual Question

What if Balfour Declaration never issued?

Scenario A: No Israel

Jewish refugees settle elsewhere after WWII
Palestine remains Arab-majority
No Israeli-Palestinian conflict
Middle East very different

Scenario B: Israel emerges anyway

Jewish immigration continues regardless
Declaration merely accelerated inevitable
Different timing, same outcome

Historical consensus: Declaration was necessary but not sufficient for Israel's creation; Holocaust and WWII were decisive factors.33

The Document's Legal Status

International Law Questions

Debated issues:34

Self-determination: Did Britain have right to promise Palestine?

Mandate legitimacy: Was League of Nations authority valid?

Indigenous rights: Were Palestinian rights "prejudiced" despite language?

Continuing obligations: Does Declaration still bind UK/successors?

Palestinian position: Declaration violated their rights; illegal from inception.35

Israeli position: Declaration provided legal basis; UN Partition (1947) solidified legitimacy.36

Academic consensus: Declaration was imperial policy; legality contested but moot given current reality.37

The Balfour Declaration Centenary (2017)

Reactions One Hundred Years Later

British government position (2017):38

Acknowledged complexity and suffering caused
Defended historical decision
Refused to apologize
Committed to two-state solution

Palestinian response: Demanded apology and reparations39

Israeli response: Celebrated as foundation of state40

Contemporary Relevance

Why it still matters:

Legal arguments cite Declaration

Symbolic importance to all parties

Model for great power intervention

Unresolved consequences ongoing

The Eschatological Fulfillment Claim

Christian Zionist Interpretation

The belief: Balfour Declaration was divine providence working through British Empire.41

Key tenets:42

Jewish return necessary for End Times

British Christians instruments of God

Israel's founding prophetically significant

Temple rebuilding next prophetic milestone

Criticism: Imposing Christian eschatology on geopolitics; self-fulfilling prophecy.43

Islamic Eschatological Response

Imran Hosein's interpretation:44

Balfour Declaration = Stage I of Pax Judaica
British Empire acting as tool of Dajjal system
False state created to deceive Muslims
Precursor to greater trials ahead

Critiques and Analysis

Critique 1: Overattributing Agency to Rothschilds

Critique: Historical evidence shows strategic calculation by British government; Rothschild connection overstated in conspiracy theories.45

Counter-argument: Why address letter to Rothschild specifically if incidental? Cui bono?

Critique 2: Ignoring Arab Agency

Critique: Framework treats Arabs as passive victims; ignores Arab nationalism, agency, and mistakes.46

Counter-argument: Power imbalance was real; British colonialism denied Arab self-determination.

Critique 3: Anachronistic Judgments

Critique: Judging 1917 decision by 2026 standards; contemporaries saw it differently.47

Counter-argument: Contemporaries (Montagu, Curzon) warned of consequences; vindicated by history.

Primary Source Documents

Where to Read the Declaration

Official archives:

UK National Archives (original letter)48
Israeli State Archives (copies)49
Published in The Times (November 9, 1917)50

Discussion Questions

Did Britain have the moral or legal authority to promise Palestine to anyone?

Could the Israeli-Palestinian conflict have been avoided with different policies in 1917?

Was the Balfour Declaration driven by strategy, theology, or conspiracy?

How much responsibility does Britain bear for subsequent violence?

Should Britain apologize for the Declaration today?

Discussion(0 comments)

Join the conversationSign in to share your perspectiveSign In

Loading comments...

Contribute to this Article

Help improve this article by suggesting edits, adding sources, or expanding content.

Submit via EmailSend your edits

References

Balfour, Arthur. Letter to Lord Rothschild, November 2, 1917. UK National Archives, FO 371/3083.

Schneer, Jonathan. The Balfour Declaration: The Origins of the Arab-Israeli Conflict. Random House, 2010. ISBN: 978-1400065325. Pages 341-365.

Strachan, Hew. The First World War. Simon & Schuster, 2003. ISBN: 978-0743261913.

Fromkin, David. A Peace to End All Peace: The Fall of the Ottoman Empire and the Creation of the Modern Middle East. Henry Holt, 1989. ISBN: 978-0805068849. Chapter 21.

Schneer (2010), chapters 15-17.

Balfour's Christian Zionist sympathies documented in: Stein, Leslie. The Balfour Declaration. Vallentine Mitchell, 2003. ISBN: 978-0853035183.

Lloyd George, David. Memoirs of the Peace Conference. Yale University Press, 1939. Lloyd George's biblical upbringing discussed extensively.

Montagu, Edwin. Cabinet memorandum "The Anti-Semitism of the Present Government" (August 1917). UK National Archives, CAB 24/24.

Ferguson, Niall. The House of Rothschild: The World's Banker 1849-1999. Penguin, 2000. ISBN: 978-0140240849.

Ferguson (2000), chapters on Rothschild-British government financing relationships.

Rothschild, Lord Lionel Walter. Role in Zionist movement documented in: Cohen, Israel. The Zionist Movement. Zionist Organization, 1946.

Negotiations timeline from: Friedman, Isaiah. The Question of Palestine: British-Jewish-Arab Relations, 1914-1918. Transaction Publishers, 1992. ISBN: 978-1560006305.

Barr, James. A Line in the Sand: The Anglo-French Struggle for the Middle East, 1914-1948. W.W. Norton, 2012. ISBN: 978-0393070651. Chapters 2-3.

Schneer (2010), chapters 18-20 on negotiation process.

McMahon, Henry. Correspondence with Hussein bin Ali, 1915-1916. Published in: Antonius, George. The Arab Awakening. Lippincott, 1939.

Barr (2012) documents "triple promise" extensively throughout.

Newton, Isaac. Observations upon the Prophecies of Daniel, and the Apocalypse of St. John. 1733. Available at Internet Archive.

Merkley, Paul. The Politics of Christian Zionism 1891-1948. Frank Cass, 1998. ISBN: 978-0714644806.

Wilson, John. Lectures on Our Israelitish Origin. 1840. Early British Israelism text.

Masonic affiliations researched in: Coil, Henry Wilson. Coil's Masonic Encyclopedia. Macoy Publishing, 1961.

Churchill's Masonic membership well documented in: Gilbert, Martin. Churchill: A Life. Henry Holt, 1991. ISBN: 978-0805023961.

Historian consensus: strategic explanations sufficient. See Schneer (2010), Barr (2012), Fromkin (1989).

Segev, Tom. One Palestine, Complete: Jews and Arabs Under the British Mandate. Metropolitan Books, 2000. ISBN: 978-0805065879. Part I.

League of Nations. "The Palestine Mandate." Confirmed July 24, 1922. Full text available at Yale Avalon Project.

Timeline from: Swedenburg, Ted. Memories of Revolt: The 1936-1939 Rebellion and the Palestinian National Past. University of Minnesota Press, 1995. ISBN: 978-0816626106.

Morris, Benny. The Birth of the Palestinian Refugee Problem Revisited. Cambridge University Press, 2004. ISBN: 978-0521009676.

Oren, Michael. Six Days of War: June 1967 and the Making of the Modern Middle East. Oxford University Press, 2002. ISBN: 978-0195151749.

B'Tselem: The Israeli Information Center for Human Rights in the Occupied Territories. Annual reports and statistics. https://www.btselem.org/

https://www.btselem.org/

Conflict deaths estimated from: Uppsala Conflict Data Program; B'Tselem data; Israeli Defense Forces records. Figures cumulative and approximate.

Karsh, Efraim. "Realist" interpretation in Empires of the Sand: The Struggle for Mastery in the Middle East 1789-1923. Harvard University Press, 2001. ISBN: 978-0674005310.

Stein, Leslie. "Moral imperative" argument in The Balfour Declaration. Vallentine Mitchell, 2003.

Said, Edward. "Imperial cynicism" critique in The Question of Palestine. Vintage, 1992. ISBN: 978-0679739883.

Historical consensus documented across: Schneer (2010), Segev (2000), Fromkin (1989).

International law analysis: Quigley, John. The Case for Palestine: An International Law Perspective. Duke University Press, 2005. ISBN: 978-0822336044.

Palestinian position: Khalidi, Rashid. The Hundred Years' War on Palestine. Metropolitan Books, 2020. ISBN: 978-1627798556.

Israeli position: Netanyahu, Benjamin. Speeches and government statements, 2017 centenary.

Academic consensus: Most scholars note contested legality but focus on political realities. See Quigley (2005).

UK Government. "Balfour Declaration Centenary" statement. Foreign Office, November 2017.

Palestinian Authority. Official statements, November 2017. Reported in Al Jazeera, Haaretz, others.

Israeli Government. Centenary celebrations documented in Israeli media, November 2017.

Christian Zionist interpretation: Merkley (1998); Ariel, Yaakov. An Unusual Relationship: Evangelical Christians and Jews. NYU Press, 2013. ISBN: 978-0814707371.

Dispensationalist theology outlined in: Weber, Timothy. On the Road to Armageddon. Baker Academic, 2004. ISBN: 978-0801027284.

Critique of Christian Zionism: Sizer, Stephen. Christian Zionism: Road-map to Armageddon? InterVarsity Press, 2004. ISBN: 978-0830832651.

Hosein, Imran Nazar. Jerusalem in the Qur'an. Masjid Jami'ah, 2002. Islamic eschatological interpretation.

Historian pushback on conspiracy theories: Schneer (2010) addresses and refutes in appendices.

Arab agency emphasized in: Rogan, Eugene. The Arabs: A History. Basic Books, 2009. ISBN: 978-0465025046.

Anachronism critique: Standard historiographical caution; e.g., Tosh, John. The Pursuit of History. Routledge, 2015. ISBN: 978-1138776883.

UK National Archives: FO 371/3083. Original Balfour Declaration letter.

Israel State Archives. Digitized collection. https://www.archives.gov.il/

https://www.archives.gov.il/

The Times (London), November 9, 1917, page 7. First public publication.

Documents collected in: Laqueur, Walter and Barry Rubin, eds. The Israel-Arab Reader. Penguin, 2008. ISBN: 978-0143113799.